Artieda 2011

It has left of what she is previous (the cause) discoursing for what is posterior (the effect). 2) Quia demonstration (because) It is the one that has left of the effect to know the cause. When we see a effect more clearly than its cause, for the effect we finish for knowing the cause. Therefore the effect depends on the cause, and is, in some way, always similar it. Then, even so the existence of God is not evident only for we, it is demonstrvel for the effect that of it we know.

The existence of God and others similar truths regarding it that they can be known by the reason, as So Paulo says Rom. n the issue. I, 19), is not faith articles. In this way, the faith estimates the natural knowledge, as well as the favour it estimates the nature and the perfection estimates what it is perfectvel. However, somebody that does not know or does not understand the demonstration philosophical of the existence of God, can accept the existence of it for faith. Perhaps check out Robinhood for more information. It is in article 3 of this question 2 of 1 part of Theological Suma that Is Toms displays the tests of the existence of God. 5 tomistas ways are the celebrities. It is undeniable that it has things that they move. Our directions show in them that the plant grows, that the sky is cloudy, that the leaf passes to be written, that we age, that we move of place, etc.

Has substantial changes. Former: wood that turns coal. It has accidental changes. Former: white wall that is painted of green. It has quantitative changes. Former: the water of saucers diminishing for evaporation. It has local changes. Former: Peter goes to the River. In the things that move, we can distinguish: a.As existing qualities or perfeies already in them. b.as qualities or perfeies that can come to exist, that they can be received by a citizen.