Artieda 2011

Another factor that if questions is the distinction, category or reality of the historical speech that critical the literary one leads for literature, the historians appeal to the same reality with that they appeal to social sciences. Literature suggests alternatives to know and to describe the world and, with this, uses the language to represent the categories of the life, the thought, the words and the experience. To say on literature, critical literary and historical imagination implies to be worried about the evolutivo process of the language, to explore its movement and meanings in all the aspects social, politician and staff. To say on modern literature engloba diverse factors: it is always an aggregate aspect to another one. The dichotomized vision of the things takes in them to this differentiated vision. However it may be, White and LCapra, when appealing the Bakhtin search new forms to approach the past due historians to search a new boarding cultural of history. To speech on the new cultural boarding of history he must yourself be remembered that we need the memory. It is the first certification the one that we can appeal.

Our souvenirs can be collective as well as the memory. Many collective memories exist: history is one of them. This is one of the characteristics for which if it distinguishes the collective memory from the historical memory. History is one and can be said that a history only exists. Universal memory does not exist. What if it can say is that all collective memory has as it has supported a group limited in the time and the space. To speak on the collective memory must be observed the variety of groups an individual is part, either family, work, etc., it coexists and it waits a reply. Of this conviviality, the individual makes a suplementarizao to the collective one and vice it turns.